Technique Magazine

Women's Technical Committee Meeting

March 6-8, 1998
Ft. Worth, Texas

I. Roll Call

Meeting was called to order at 9:00 AM by Marilyn Cross, WTC Chairman

Present:
Region 1Pam Bileck
Region 2Linda Mulvihill
Region 3Carole Bunge
Region 4Linda Thorberg
Region 5Char Christensen
Region 6Kathy Ostberg, proxy for Cindy Sielski
Region 7Cheryl Hamilton
Region 8Marian Dykes
JOPCC Tom Koll
EPC Roe Kreutzer (Fri.)
NAWGJ Yvonne Hodge
NCAAPat Panichas
JO Program Manager Connie Maloney
WPD Kathy Kelly (Fri.)
Absent:
JCI Delene Darst
WABC Jan Greenhawk

II. Compulsory Handspring Vault

Motion to change/add the following deductions to the Level 4/5/6 Handspring Vault, EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 1998:
Support phase#2. Too long in support-up to 0.50 (delete failure to leave horse by vertical)
Support Phase Add as # 3 Angle of repulsion (point at which gymnast leaves the horse) Up to 1.00 (use the angle deductions printed in the WTC minutes, page 43 in Technique Volume 17, #10 (October, 1997).
Motion: C. Bunge
Second: C. Hamilton
PASSED

III. Competition Rules

Motion that when determining the maximum allowable number of judgments per day, the meet director must conform to the following, EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 1998: Therefore, the maximum number of judgments per day will be dictated by the number of sessions conducted within the above time parameters, which includes break time for judges between sessions (minimum of 30 minutes after every 31/2 to 4 hours of judging is recommended).

Motion: A. Schweyer
Second: C. Christensen
PASSED

Recommendation that whenever meets are conducted with more than one level in a squad, that the athletes of the same level compete consecutively. When moving to the next event, the first competitor of a level would be dropped to the last spot.
Example: Squads of 8 (4 level 8's #'s 101-104, 4 level 9's #'s 201-204) would rotate as follows:

VaultBarsBeamFloor
101102103104
102103104101
103104101102
104101102103
201202203204
202203204201
203204201202
204201202203
In the case of a team invitational, all teams in the squad would compete their level 8's, then the level 9's, in the team order drawn for that event.

IV. Performance of Restricted Elements at Levels 7 and 8

The committee discussed the problem of voiding exercises at Level 7 and 8.

Motion for Level 8 that EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 1998, the following will VOID the exercise:

All other D or E elements performed would receive a 2.00 penalty (each) and all appropriate execution/amplitude deductions would be applied.

Motion: M. Dykes
Second: L. Thorberg
PASSED

Motion for Level 7 that EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 1998, all event requirements must be fulfilled by performing A or B elements only. If an A or B element is performed with such great amplitude or timing that it results in the performance of a C element, there would be no penalty. However, if an element that is listed only as a C is performed (examples on FX: Schushunova), then a 2.00 penalty would be applied. The performance of D/E elements will void the exercise.

Motion: M. Dykes
Second: C. Bunge
PASSED

Uneven Bar exceptions: The following C elements are allowed at Level 7: Cast handstand with 1/2 turn, Clear hip handstand with 1/2 turn, back uprise to clear hip circle to handstand (counts as two B elements). A straddle back to handstand is not allowed at Level 7.

V. Level 7 Concerns

A. Questions & Answers from Technique, Vol. 18, #2 Beam #13

In reference to the switch-leg leap being used as the isolated Large leap requirement: EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 1998, the switch-leg leap cannot be used to fulfill the requirement of alarge leap with 180° leg separation. If the only isolated leap with 180° leg separation performed is a switch-leg leap, then the athlete will receive a 1.80 deduction for omission of the requirement.

A switch-leg leap, however, may be used as part of the gym series and/or as an additional isolated leap. There would be no penalty if the gymnast exceeds the split requirement of the B switch-leg leap and performs the C leap (160-180°).

B. LEVEL 7 BEAM AND FLOOR: Reminder that chassés and assemblés are not considered as A elements and may not be used to fulfill requirements (gym series). If the isolated leap requirement is followed by a chassé, there is no penalty since the chassé is not considered as a value part. Note: This also applies to level 8, 9 and 10.

C. There is no flashing of start values at level 7.

D. LEVEL 7 BEAM: The flight element must be performed entirely on the beam (not as the mount or dismount element). It may, however, be used in the dismount series. (Example: flic-flac to back salto stretched dismount series will fulfill both the acro flight and salto/aerial dismount requirements.)

E. LEVEL 7 BARS: Kip mount requirement clarification:
As a mount, a Glide, straddle cut, glide kip will be allowed to fulfill the A or B kip mount requirement and will be considered as one element. If the straddle cut is followed by a kip or long hang kip within the exercise, it would be considered two elements.

F. LEVEL 7 VAULT:
Motion to add the following deductions for Level 7 Vault EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 1998, to be used in addition to the optional deductions found in the FIG Code of Points:

Motion: M. Dykes
Second: A. Schweyer
PASSED

Clarification: If the gymnast performs a vault different than the vault announced (or flashed), each judge takes the 0.2 deduction for performing the wrong vault.

VI. FIG Code of Points Update and the Jr. Olympic Program

The committee reviewed the changes made for the Elite program per the FIG Code of Points Clarification and Update from December, 1997. This was printed previous in Technique magazine (Vol. 18, #3, March, 1998).

The following decisions were made for implementation for the Jr. Olympic program, EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 1998:

GENERAL

OPTIONAL VAULT

Change the following deductions:

In regards to the late open/extension deduction, the WTC created the following guidelines for applying the up to 0.50 penalty:

Salto vaults: Opening refers to the change in body shape from a tuck or pike position to an extended stretched position. If the gymnast achieves an open, but then pikes down to land, deduct up to 0.20 for body position error.

To receive no deduction for late open, the gymnast must extend from the salto position by horizontal (3 o'clock). From horizontal to 45° below horizontal, deduct up to 0.30. If the open occurs past 45° below horizontal, deduct 0.40-0.50. The maximum penalty of 0.50 would be applied if there is absolutely no attempt to extend from the salto position.

Non-Salto Twisting Vaults: Opening refers to finishing the twist by horizontal (3 o'clock) to show an extended stretched position before landing. From horizontal to 45° below horizontal, deduct up to 0.30. If the open occurs past 45° below horizontal, deduct 0.40-0.50. If the gymnast fails to complete the twist upon landing, deduct 0.50 for late open/extension and an additional up to 0.30 gymnast fails to complete the twist upon landing, deduct 0.50 for late open/extension and an additional up to 0.30 for incomplete twist.

New Vault: 2.502 Handspring on - Tucked salto forward with 11/2 (540°) twist off - 10.00 for JO Program (9.9-Elite)

OPTIONAL BARS

The following deductions will now apply to the JO Program:
Squat on LB, with or without sole circle or with 1/2 turn to grasp HB (more than one)0.05 (Level 10 only)
From hang on HB, swing forward, place feet on bar to stand and 1/2 turn0.10
Swing forward with 1/2 turn under horizontal0.10
Kip cast to under 45° 0.10
Swing backward under horizontal0.10
Note: If a grip change is made on backswing, it breaks a connection and also receives 0.10 deduction. OPTIONAL BEAM To clarify the wolf hops and wolf jumps on Beam, the following values will be in effect AUGUST 1, 1998 for the JO Program:
J.O. Elite
(effec. 8/98)(effec.1/98)
2.111Wolf hop (off one foot)AA*
2.211Wolf hop 1/2B (was c)B*
2.311Wolf hop 3/4C (was D)C*
2.411Wolf hop 1/1D (was E)D*
*Value for USA Elite until clarified by FIG
J.O. Elite
(effec. 8/98)(effec.1/98)
2.211Wolf jump (off two feet)BB
2.311Wolf jump 1/2C (was D)C
2.411Wolf jump 3/4DD
2.511Wolf jump 1/1EE
OPTIONAL FLOOR
J.O.Elite
(effec. 8/98)(effec.1/98)
Wolf hop (from one foot) A1.117 A*1.117
Wolf hop 1/2 B1.217A1.117
Wolf hop 1/1C1.317B1.217
Wolf hop 11/2D1.417C1.317
Wolf hop 2/1E1.517D1.417
*Value for USA Elite until clarified by FIG

VII. FIG Technical Liaison to WTC

K. Kelly brought forth the question of whether the WTC would like to have an FIG Technical Liaison officially added to the USAG-WTC. The committee felt that if there is a specific need to have additional FIG input, that an invitation for the FIG liaison to attend a specific meeting or conference call would be adequate.

VIII. National Elite Testing Program Education

A judges educational experience addressing the Elite National Testing program will be offered prior to an International Training Camp to be held in May, 1998. A minimum of 24 judges will be invited to attend, with

IX. National Elite Program Committee Report

R. Kreutzer informed the WTC of the success of the 1997 TOPS testing and addition of TOP athletes in the Classic/Challenge. Jackets were presented to all participants at the 1998 American Challenge and Classic competitions. The U.S. Classic/National Gymnastics Festival will be held July 31-August 2, 1998 in San Antonio.

A National Team Coaches summit was conducted in December for the purpose of strategic planning. Discussion was held in regards to the participation of athletes in Elite regional testing/meets outside of their home region. The WTC conveyed that the Elite clubs should be supporting their own regional Elite events.

Recommendation to the Elite Program Committee that the decision to allow an athlete to attend a Regional meet outside of their own region be approved by both regions' Elite Program Committee Chairman, in consultation with both regions' Regional Technical Chairman and/or the Regional Chairman. (Refer to R&P, page 108 B. e.)

Recommendation to the EPC that even though an athlete competing in another region's Elite meet may use the score to qualify to Challenge/Classic, they are not eligible for awards.

X. Affiliation of Judges

Reminder:
Judges that are affiliated may NOT be assigned as Chief Judge to a USA Gymnastics qualifying meet if the team that the judge is affiliated with is competing in the meet to which the judge has been assigned. If meets are using one-judge panels, an affiliated judge may be assigned ONLY when there are not enough non-affiliated judges available and only with the approval of the RTC. If the RTC is the person involved, approval must come from the State Chair.

XI. NCAA Report

P. Panichas clarified that the NCAA Women's Gymnastics Committee is in charge of Regional and National competitions. The newly formed USAG Women's Collegiate Program Committee is charged with making recommendations to the NCAA WGC regarding the adoption of J.O. Rules. The Round-off entry vault is being allowed for the first time in NCAA competition.

In the 1999 season, the NCAA regions will be realigned, going from five to six regions and seeding the top twelve teams into the six regions.

XII. Elite Technical Report

A. Schweyer asked the committee to communicate to her in writing (by June 1) any concerns/recommendations regarding the evaluation of the Elite Testing.

There was discussion regarding the definition of an "open tuck" salto position which is allowed at the National level. This refers to the athlete who performs a double salto backward without grabbing the legs.

XIII. NAWGJ Report

Y. Hodge gave a written and oral report.

EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY the 1998 Federal mileage rate is $.32 per mile.

XIV. Optional Element Evaluations and Clarifications

GENERAL:
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 1998 for the Jr. Olympic Program, that no bonus (extra D/E or Special Connection) will be awarded with a deduction of 0.30 or more. (This is a change from the present rule of a deduction of 0.20 or more negates bonus.)

Motion: C. Hamilton
Second: A. Schweyer
PASSED

Element Evaluations: Add the following elements to the J. O. Supplement:

BARS-EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY:
Bars: Long hang pullover - A element - Add to # 7.102

Motion: C. Hamilton
Second: C. Bunge
PASSED

A tap swing - counterswing as performed in the Level 5 or 6 compulsory exercise is not considered to be an element and would be considered as an extra swing in an optional exercise (Level 7 and above).

BARS-EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 1998 for the J.O. Program:
Change #7.202 to # 7.302
Clear hip hecht (also with 1/2 turn) from Low bar to high bar (change from B to C)

BEAM-EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY:
Backward shoulder roll - A element - Add to # 6.104

Motion: C. Christensen
Second: C. Hamilton
PASSED

FLOOR-EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY:
Whip salto with 1/2 turn = B Add to # 6.206

UNEVEN BAR CLARIFICATIONS:
A. When an element finishes with a backswing showing maximum amplitude to handstand (within 20° of vertical for J.O.), then it is considered as only one element.
Examples:

B. Straight body cast to handstand, legs together = B
Straddle cast to handstand = A
However, once the handstand is achieved and a turn or hop grip is performed, it takes on the value listed for cast handstand with legs together.
Examples:
Straddle cast handstand with 1/2 turn = C
Straddle cast with hop grip in handstand = C

Motion from the WTC to the JOPC to reconsider the use of hop grip change to fulfill the Special Requirement of flight element.
Motion: C. Hamilton
Second: A. Schweyer
PASSED (7 in favor, 1 abstention)
Note: The JOPC will review this recommendation at their June meeting.

Reminder: Coaches and judges should use the correct chain of command to present technical questions (i.e., first to your RTC). If the RTC does not have an answer, she will pursue through National Chairmen, etc.

XV. Incorrect Attire

The FIG Code allows stud earrings only. The judge should first warn the gymnast prior to competing and report the warning to the Meet Referee. If the gymnast proceeds to compete without removing the jewelry, then the judge will deduct 0.10 from the average score of that event.

XVI. JCI

JCI has redefined the requirements for active status, in particular the practice judging requirements. Please see minutes from JCI's meeting in the upcoming May 1998 issue of Technique magazine.
Reminder: Judges who had a rating from the past cycle must have re-certified with the new JCI exam. They no longer hold their old rating until they pass both parts of the new exam.

XVII. JR. Olympic Program Committee Report

T. Koll reported that the JOP Committee will be dealing with the age divisions for Levels 9 and 10. It was suggested that a survey regarding meet evaluation and qualification procedures be included in J.O. National coaches' packets.

XVIII. Congress Presentations

XIX. Level 7 and 8 Judges Training Videos

The WTC evaluated exercises for the production of a script for the new judges' training videos.

XX. Rules and Policies Update

In the April 1998 issue of Technique magazine, there is an errata section for the Women's Rules and Policies on page 15. Please update your book.

Meeting adjourned on Sunday, March 8 at 1:00 PM. Next meeting to be announced.

These minutes are published in the April 1998 issue of Technique magazine, Vol. 18, No. 4.



[ Home ]
[ Publications ]
[ Current Technique Index ]
[ 1998 Technique Index ]


About USA Gymnastics Online.
Please report problems to our webmaster.
Copyright © 1998 USA Gymnastics. All rights reserved.

URL: http://www.usa-gymnastics.org/publications/technique/1998/4/wtc-mar06.html